The Digital Rights Paradox: Arbitrase sebagai Mediator Konflik antara Monopoli Hak Cipta AI dan Hak Dasar Konsumen Digital
Keywords:
Digital Arbitration, AI Copyright, Digital Consumer Protection, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Technology MonopolyAbstract
This research analyzes the digital rights paradox in the artificial intelligence era, particularly the tension between AI copyright monopolies controlled by major technology corporations and fundamental digital consumer rights. Employing normative legal research methodology through statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case study approaches, this study identifies conflict manifestations in AI-generated content ownership, closed platform ecosystems, and algorithmic opacity. The root causes include information asymmetry, economic imbalances, regulatory ambiguity, and cross-jurisdictional complexities. Conventional litigation mechanisms prove ineffective due to high costs, lengthy duration, and limited technical competence. This research explores arbitration as an alternative offering flexibility, arbiter expertise, and efficiency, yet faces fairness challenges in mandatory arbitration. Recommendations include a comprehensive arbitration framework for Indonesia that balances innovation protection and consumer rights through specialized rules, restrictions on unfair clauses, and integration with broader regulatory ecosystems.
References
Undang-Undang
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 42.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 138.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 266.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 251.
European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union L 119/1, 2016.
European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on Artificial Intelligence (AI Act). Official Journal of the European Union L 2024/1689, 2024.
Buku
Bridy, Annemarie. Copyright and AI: Authorship, Infringement, and Fair Use in the Age of Machine Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Casey, Bryan, and Mark A. Lemley. Fair Learning: Copyright and Innovation in the Age of AI. Stanford: Stanford Law Books, 2024.
Grimmelman, James. The Law and Ethics of AI- Generated Content. New York: Columbia University Press, 2023.
Pasquale, Frank. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2022.
Reyna, Angélica, and Thomas Streinz. AI Governance in the European Union: Regulation, Ethics, and Policy. Brussels: European Policy Centre, 2023.
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2021.
Artikel Jurnal
Akerlof, George A. "The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, no. 3 (2020): 488-500.
Braithwaite, John, and Ian Ayres. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Galanter, Marc. "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change." Law and Society Review 9, no. 1 (2022): 95-160.
Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. "An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law." Journal of Legal Studies 18, no. 2 (2020): 325-363.
Lessig, Lawrence. "Code is Law: On Liberty in Cyberspace." Harvard Magazine (2021): 60-65.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2021.
Sander, Frank E.A. "Varieties of Dispute Processing." Federal Rules Decisions 70 (2020): 111-134.
Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Sternlight, Jean R. "Mandatory Binding Arbitration and the Demise of the Seventh Amendment Right to a Jury Trial." Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 16, no. 3 (2021): 669-733.
Sumber Lainnya
U.S. Copyright Office. Copyright and Artificial Intelligence Part 3: Generative AI Training. Washington D.C.: U.S. Copyright Office, 2025.
World Economic Forum. Global AI Governance Outlook 2024. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2024.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. Statistik Pengguna Layanan AI di Indonesia 2020-2023. Jakarta: Kominfo, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salma Dwi Agustina, Diska Pebri Wulandari, Endah Hanifah, Arina Kartawijaya, Irvan Fahmi Ramdhani Sofyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
