Analisis Perbandingan Penerapan Hukum Merek Indonesia dengan Standar Internasional: Sengketa IKEA vs PT Ratania Khatulistiwa

Authors

  • Febriyanti Maharani Dewi Universitas Nusa Putra
  • Neng Risma Oktavia Universitas Nusa Putra
  • Dina Aulia Universitas Nusa Putra
  • Muhamad Ludfi Damiri Universitas Nusa Putra

Keywords:

Indonesian brand law, first file, non-use clause, IKEA dispute

Abstract

This study examines the comparison of brand law implementation between the Indonesian legal system and international legal standards using the case of brand dispute between IKEA Sweden and PT Ratania Khatulistiwa Indonesia. The emphasis of research is aimed at the legal protection of well-known brands, the implementation of the first-to-file principle in Indonesia, and its connection with the well-known marks principle as regulated by the Paris Convention and the TRIPs Agreement. The method of study used is a normative legal approach with studies of relevant legal regulations, international conventions, and court decisions. The results of the study indicate that Indonesia has adopted most of the provisions of international brand protection, but in practice there is still a discrepancy between international norms and implementation at the national level, especially in recognition of well-known brands. The Supreme Court's ruling in the IKEA case shows that the first-to-file principle is still a priority over recognition of the brand's global reputation. The conclusion of the study stated the need for national legal alignment with international provisions through regulatory reinforcement and law enforcement in order to create effective, fair, and globally competitive brand protection.

References

Sudjana, S. (2020). Desain kemasan produk (analisis perbandingan: efektivitas pelindungan desain industri atau merek). Jurnal Ecodemica: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 4(1), 117-126. https://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ecodemica/article/download/7342/3968

Anggraeni, Happy Yulia, and Erna Listiawati. “Enigma Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Tindakan Misappropriation Oleh Pihak Asing Dalam Regulasi Internasional.” Jurnal USM Law Review 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.25.1.35.

Devina, Nisya Hamidah Khairani, Ameliya Ratna Sari, Maria Sesilia Toe Labina, Surya Afif Rahmandika, and Mustika Mega Wijaya. “Pendekatan Hukum Perdata Internasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Terkait Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Bidang Merek (Sengketa IKEA PT Ratania Khatulistiwa Indonesia Dan IKEA Swedia).” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice 1, no. 3 (January 2024): 11. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i3.2123.

Ecodemica, Vol. No. April 2016. n.d. http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ecodemica.

Edyson, David, and Muhammad Rafi. “Perlindungan Hukum Mengenai Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 8, no. 1 (2024). https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/downl oad/6438/3862

Faradz, Haedah. Along with Ratifying of WTO Which Loading Rule of Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS). 2001. https://www.academia.edu/download/86555900/27_3 82_1_PB.pdf

Roji, Fathur. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK TERDAFTAR DALAM MENGATASI PELANGGARAN MEREK ATAS TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK PERSPEKTIF UNDANG- UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016.” In Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap…, vol. 2. no. 2. 2023.

https://news.detik.com/berita/d.5022661/barang-kw- banjiri-pasar-mengapa-produsennya-susah-.

Sidauruk, Jinner, Lesson Sihotang, and Marthin Simangunsong. KETENTUAN HUKUM MEREK WELLKNOWN MARK DALAM PEMBERLIAN MELALUI ONLINE. n.d. https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/pengabdian.

Terkenal, Merek, and Sistem Merek Indonesia. Insan Budi Maulana. Merek Terkenal Menurut TRIPS Agreement Dan Penerapan. Menurut TRIPS Agreement Dan Penerapan Dalam. n.d.

Rahman, E. A. (2025). ANALISIS KOMPREHENSIF PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM MEREK DAGANG DALAM BISNIS DI INDONESIA: Comprehensive Analysis of Legal Protection for Trademarks In Business In Indonesia. Res Nullius Law Journal, 7(1), 48-62.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 tentang Sengketa Merek “IKEA” antara IKEA Systems BV melawan PT Ratania Khatulistiwa.

Sudjana, S. (2023). Penegakan hukum merek dalam hukum Indonesia terhadap pemenuhan ketentuan TRIPS– WTO. Res Nullius Law Journal, 3(2), 78–90. https://ojs.unikom.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/4 659

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. (2016). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 252.

Wibowo, T. (2020). Analisis sengketa merek IKEA vs PT Ratania Khatulistiwa dalam perspektif hukum merek dan perlindungan merek terkenal. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no3.2794

Sheilindry, I., Z, M. A., & Syarifudin, A. (n.d.). Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Kontrak Bisnis Elektronik Atas Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang. [cite_start]SIMBUR CAHAYA, 28(2), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v28i2.1317

Nabila, D. D., & Sanusi. (2023). Protection for Registered Trademark Under Indonesian Law and the Wto Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Trips). Student Journal International Law, 3(2), 132–147. [cite_start]Retrieved from http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/SJIL

Pangestu, R. R., & Masrur, D. R. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal IKEA (Analisa Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 264 K/Pdt.Sus- Hki/2015). [cite_start]ICA of LAW, 1(2), 26–51.

Senftleben, M. (2024). The Unproductive "Overconstitutionalization" of EU Copyright and Trademark Law – Fundamental Rights Rhetoric and Reality in CJEU Jurisprudence. [cite_start]IIC, 55, 1471–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01527-8

[A., Pratama, D. P., & Thoriq, M. (2025). Kepastian Hukum dalam Perlindungan Merek Terkenal: Studi atas Implementasi Perjanjian Internasional di Indonesia. [cite_start]Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains, 4(1), 162–168.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-18