Peran Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Perlindungan Merek Open Mic Indonesia dari Unsur Generik
Keywords:
DGIP, generic terms, open mic Indonesia, trademark protectionAbstract
This research examines the role of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) in protecting the trademark "Open Mic Indonesia" from generic terms elements and analyzes the legal decision on trademark cancellation based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The registration of "Open Mic Indonesia" trademark by Ramon Pratama in 2015 sparked controversy as the term "open mic" is widely recognized as a generic term in the entertainment industry. This research employs normative juridical methods by analyzing laws, court decisions, and relevant literature. The study reveals that DGIP plays a crucial role in conducting substantive examination to ensure registered trademarks meet the distinctiveness requirements and do not contain generic terms as stipulated in Article 20 letters e and f of the Trademark Law. The analysis of Decision Number 85/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst confirms that "open mic" is a common term belonging to the public domain since the 1930s, and the addition of "Indonesia" does not provide sufficient distinctiveness. This decision emphasizes that the first-to-file system cannot legitimize monopoly over generic terms. The research recommends that DGIP enhance its verification mechanisms through comprehensive examination including international dictionary searches, term usage databases, and expert consultations to prevent future registration of generic terms and maintain balance between exclusive trademark rights and public interest in using common terms.
References
Canggih Gumanky Farunik, Septiana Dwiputri Maharani, and Annisa Daniati. “‘ Conflict Of Interest ’ dalam Pendaftaran Merek di Lingkungan DJKI ( Studi Kasus Etika Dalam Pendaftaran Merek Citayam Fashion Week).” Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, dan Sosial Budaya Volume, 2023, 13–24.
Fitri Novia Heriani. “Begini Tanggapan DJKI Terkait Kasus ‘Open Mic Indonesia’,".” HukumOnline.com, 2023.
Triyono Nadia Ariqa Syamdra, Budi Santoso. “Perlindungan Hukum Merek Deskriptif Antara Teori Dan Praktik Peradilan di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 85/Pdt.Sus- HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst).”Diponegoro Law Journal, 2025.
Simona Bustani Ramzy Sultan Nur Syarief. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kata ‘ Miss Universe ’ Sebagai Merek yang Terdaftar.” 2025, 920–32.
Elsa Septiani and Irma Maulida. “Dampak Keterlambatan Pendaftaran Ulang Merek : Analisis Perlindungan Hukum dan Peran DJKI.” Jurnal Hukum Nusantara, 2025, 200–207.
Angie Octavia Susanto and Jeane Neltje Saly. “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Merek Terdaftar Pada DJKI.” Jurnal Ilmiah indonesia p- ISSN:2541-0849 e-ISSN:2548-1398, 2023.
Tomy Syahputra. “Analisis Putusan Pembatalan Merek Open Mic (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 85/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.).” Universitas Borneo Tarakan, 2024.
Rachmadi Usman. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: dan Dimensi Hukumnya di Indonesia. Alumni, Bandung, 2003.
Jeane Nelje Saly Yemima Andria Hotmauli Simanjuntak. “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Generic Terms Dalam Perlindungan Merek.” Jurnal Ilmiah indonesia p-ISSN:2541-0849 e-ISSN:2548-1398, 2023.
“Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.” 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fuja Sira Oktapiani, Naura Sany Shabira, Ceuceu Triana, Faqih Hanif Ramdhana, Esrom Elieser Langodai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.





