Implikasi Pasal 1 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Hak Cipta terhadap HKI Ciptaan AI: Pendekatan Yuridis Normatif untuk Respons Strategis Perdata Nasional Indonesia Menghadapi Tantangan Disrupsi Kreatif
Keywords:
normative vacuum, copyright, artificial intelligence, normative juridical, creative disruptionAbstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new creative works that have created a normative vacuum in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the Indonesian Copyright Law, which explicitly recognizes humans as creators. This vacuum has opened up legal gaps regarding the protection and ownership status of AI-generated works. This study uses a normative juridical approach to analyze this problem using extensive interpretation methods, legal analogies, and new legal constructions to fill the legal vacuum. The results of the study formulate a response strategy framework through regulatory revisions that accommodate the involvement of AI technology by emphasizing the contribution of creative humans, as well as the development of adaptive judicial and administrative guidelines. This approach is expected to provide legal certainty, encourage technological innovation, and support the development of the digital creative industry in Indonesia.
References
Abbott, Ryan. “I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727884.
Chrisanti, Nadya Dewi, and Hariyo Sulistiyantoro. “Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta Karya Seni Buatan Artificial Intelligence Ditinjau Pada Negara Indonesia, Inggris, Dan Kanada (Studi Komparatif Di Indonesia, Inggris, Dan Kanada).” Kabilah: Journal of Social Community Terakreditasi 9, no. 2 (2022):132–43.
Habibi, Muhammad, N Febriana, Nur Kholan Karima, Bayu Sudjatmiko, Magister Ilmu, and Hukum Universitas. “Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.6. No.4 (2025) Tema/Edisi : Hukum Perdata (Bulan Keempat) Https://Jhlg.Rewangrencang.Com/” 6, no.4 (2025): 1–18.
Hawamdeh, Suliman, Jeonghyun Kim, and Xin Wang. “Foundations of the Information and Knowledge Professions.” Foundations of the Information and Knowledge Professions, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.12794/sps.ot- information-knowledge-professions.
Hugenholtz, Paul Goldstein dan P. Bernt. “International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice,” n.d.
Ilmiah, Jurnal, and Wahana Pendidikan. “1 , 2 1,2” 10, no. November (2024): 561–77.
Junio, Nazar, Romi Faslah B A Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi, Maulana Malik, Ibrahim Malang, and B Manajemen. “Melindungi Kreativitas Di Tanah Air: Lanskap Hukum Hak Cipta Indonesia Di Tengah Disrupsi Teknologi.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 01, no. 3 (2025): 328–32.https://jurnal.globalscients.com/index.php/jkhpk.
Kristopansen, Kristopansen, Wiwik Sri Widiarty, and Bernard Nainggolan. “Pengaruh Teknologi Dalam Perkembangan Hak Cipta.” Jurnal Sosial Teknologi 5, no. 4 (2025): 903–24. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i 4.32066.
P.Zuki. “Penelitian Hukum.” Prenadamedia Group, 2016, 57.
Putra, Akhmat Yanuari, and Abdul Halim Barkatullah. “Kepastian Hukum Hak Cipta Atas Karya Yang Dihasilkan Oleh Artificial Intelligence.” Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, Dan Humaniora 9, no. 2 (2025): 979. https://doi.org/10.31604/jim.v9i2.2025.97 9-987.
Ricketson, Sam, and Jane C Ginsburg. “The Berne Convention and Neighbouring Rights.” International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, 2022, 1206–1308. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/97801988019 86.003.0019.
Samuelson, Pamela, James Boyle, and M. Ethan Katsh. “The Quest for Enabling Metaphors for Law and Lawyering in the Information Age.” Michigan Law Review 94, no. 6 (1996): 2029. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289983.
“Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Pasal 10 Ayat (1), Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157,” n.d.
Vitor de Souza, Paulo. “Artificial Intelligence and Copyright.” De Legibus Revista de Direito 1, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.53456/dlb.vi1.7536.
World Intellectual Property Organization, (WIPO). “WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property (IP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI).” Revised Issues Paper on IP and AI, no. WIPO/IP/AI/2/GE/20/1 Rev (2020): 10.ps://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_de tails.jsp?doc_id=407578.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putri Riby Trada, Cici Rahmawati, Rika Wulandari, Muhamad Alfi Dzkiri Salam, Cici Munte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
